Summary: The Dignity Test
Series 05: Who You Are When You Forget
Dr. Miriam Osei is 59 and has consulted with memory care facilities on clinical ethics for 22 years. She does not tell families what they want to hear. She has three questions she asks every family before she recommends any intervention. The first: What does your loved one want? The second: How do you know? The third, the one that makes people angry: What will you do if the answer is not what you want to hear?
We are in a consultation room with the adult children of Walter Hines, 84, who has advanced Alzheimer’s. They want to know whether a camera monitoring system is appropriate. Dr. Osei has not answered. She is asking her questions. The room shifts on the third question. The family came to discuss a device. Dr. Osei is asking them to discuss a person.
The dignity test is five questions. Every technology intervention in memory care answers them, whether it intends to or not. The first asks whether the intervention serves the person or the family’s need to manage the person. Both may be justified, but they are different interventions with different ethical standings. Walter’s children want cameras in his room so they can see him from three different states. The cameras would reduce their distance and their helplessness. Dr. Osei asks: what will the cameras do for Walter? He does not know what a camera is. He will not feel safer because one is watching.
The second question asks whether the intervention preserves agency or creates a more comfortable form of control. The medication dispenser that guides the person through the sequence is a different instrument than the one that locks the medications away. The door sensor that chimes gently is different from the one that triggers an alarm. Each pair is the same technology applied with different intent. The agency-preserving version requires more design work. The control version runs itself.
The third asks whether the intervention treats the person as someone still becoming or as someone already gone. A person with moderate Alzheimer’s formed a preference for a new activity last month. She did not remember forming it, but the preference persisted. She is still changing, still responding to her environment. Every intervention that treats her as finished has failed this question.
The fourth asks whether the intervention respects the person’s documented voice. Advance directives and values statements are the record of what the person wanted before they could no longer say it. The family with documentation makes decisions in the person’s voice. The family without it makes decisions in their own voice and calls it care.
The fifth asks whether the intervention accounts for how the person experiences dignity now, which may not match how they experienced it before. Walter wanders to the garden every afternoon. The facility calls it a behavioral problem. Dr. Osei asks what Walter is seeking. A man who gardened for sixty years is not exhibiting a symptom when he walks toward a garden. He is seeking the thing the room does not provide. The intervention that stops the behavior without providing the garden has answered the facility’s need without answering Walter’s.
Dr. Osei works through the five questions with the family. The camera system would have served their anxiety. The intervention she recommends, a garden walk at 2 PM, a personal music playlist built from his biographical profile, increased in-person visits, serves Walter. They are different interventions answering different questions. The dignity test asks which question the care plan should answer first.
Read the full article on BlueMirror.life.